FICTIONAL ROGUEINTELLIGENCE.ORG

ACTIVE // A RESPONSE ACTION RECORDED BEFORE THE SUPPOSEDLY LEAKED BRIEFING WAS DELIVERED.

Alliance Leak

A temporary counterintelligence alliance loses compartmented information before all members receive it.

Pressure map Compare people Map motives Aftermath

PLAYER OBJECTIVEFind the leak without allowing the investigation itself to become the weapon that destroys the alliance.

GAME MECHANIC

OPERATIONAL STAKES

What changes when the player acts

Anika’s credibility, Caleb’s access, Nia’s privacy boundary, and the Accord’s survival.

Decision points

Use a canary disclosure that may endanger a real source.
Accuse a person, a process, or a planted evidence channel.

Compartmented finding withheld

The elevated source set changes how this operation is interpreted.

Open access terminal

GAME MECHANIC

HUMANS UNDER OPERATIONAL PRESSURE

The objective is the same. The threatened self is different for each person.

Each principal enters the operation with a different need, feared loss, loyalty pattern, moral boundary, and recovery requirement.

CI-009

Anika Voss

Leak Investigator

Protecting: Reach a defensible conclusion without institutional panic
Fearing: Becoming certain too early and creating the traitor she was supposed to find
Under pressure: Stops taking notes and memorizes exact phrasing
Will not cross: Will use treatment access logs when they establish physical opportunity, with strict scope
Agency restored by: Independent chain-of-custody review and a colleague who can veto her

Open complete psychology map

EMP-031

Caleb Rook

Security Supervisor

Protecting: Certainty that his protection is protecting the right person
Fearing: Becoming the instrument of an unseen command
Under pressure: Controls space, removes options, positions himself between people and exits
Will not cross: Will not deliver a frightened person to someone who refuses to identify themselves
Agency restored by: A verifiable chain of custody and permission to protect rather than interrogate

Open complete psychology map

EMP-044

Nia Okafor

Day Room Facilitator

Protecting: Preserve dignity and mutual intelligibility
Fearing: Becoming an instrument of coercive observation
Under pressure: Voice becomes quieter; she moves toward exits while increasing structure
Will not cross: Will break confidence to prevent imminent harm, then accept accountability
Agency restored by: Peer review, clear consent boundaries, ordinary conversation

Open complete psychology map

CON-208

Sofia Marín

Forensic Accountant

Protecting: Make hidden obligations visible
Fearing: Mistaking elegant fraud for proof and destroying an innocent person
Under pressure: Recalculates basic totals and stops making eye contact
Will not cross: Will freeze funds on a lower threshold when lives are at immediate risk
Agency restored by: Independent replication and a witness willing to challenge her model

Open complete psychology map

GAME MECHANIC

AFTERMATH & RECOVERY

The objective closes before the human consequences do.

Follow immediate result, changed trust, moral cost, institutional interpretation, private meaning, repair, and continuing conflict.

Unresolved human cost

Anika’s credibility, Caleb’s access, Nia’s privacy boundary, and the Accord’s survival. Not every consequence can be repaired by revealing classified truth.

Institutional interpretation

Preserve authority and continuity Control which account becomes actionable Limit reputational, legal, or operational exposure

Private interpretation

The public briefing does not establish one motive, sponsor, or complete chronology.

Recovery routes

Specific acknowledgment of harm
Restored choice and information
Independent review
Practical support and time
Permission to refuse renewed operational use

Debrief questions

Whose interpretation became actionable, and whose remained contestable?
Which relationship or ordinary-life goal was changed by the process itself?
What repair is still owed after the stated objective ends?

Anika Voss

Lingering effect: The operation leaves reach a defensible conclusion without institutional panic unresolved and changes at least one trust boundary.

Repair: Independent chain-of-custody review and a colleague who can veto her

Future: Repairs fountain pens when reports are delayed.

Caleb Rook

Lingering effect: The operation leaves certainty that his protection is protecting the right person unresolved and changes at least one trust boundary.

Repair: A verifiable chain of custody and permission to protect rather than interrogate

Future: Wants to leave security work without feeling that departure is another abandoned post.

Nia Okafor

Lingering effect: The operation leaves preserve dignity and mutual intelligibility unresolved and changes at least one trust boundary.

Repair: Peer review, clear consent boundaries, ordinary conversation

Future: Keeps one afternoon each month free to take her nephew to the public aquarium.

Sofia Marín

Lingering effect: The operation leaves make hidden obligations visible unresolved and changes at least one trust boundary.

Repair: Independent replication and a witness willing to challenge her model

Future: Uses cooking timers for focused work and routinely ignores them when a ledger becomes interesting.

Mission success is not recovery. Track every participant after the immediate objective.

Open aftermath center